Comments for WD Gann

Comment on An Ephemeris Review from Olga Morales at AstrologyforGannTraders.com.au by Mike

Mike — Sun, 25 Dec 2016 15:04:50 +0000

Astrology is generally not accepted as a true science-based form of analysis. Astrology is a cycle based not predicated on today’s planetary positions. You must find the right point to begin in “time” to begin proper analysis. The starting point may be years ago …or years ahead. (ie. looking back from 1940). There is a reason Christ rose on the 3rd day and not the 1st or 5th. Find the right cycle …you will find the right beginning point.

Comment on Which edition of “How to Make Profits in Commodities” do you have? by Antistes

Antistes — Tue, 30 Aug 2016 04:32:40 +0000

Hi COdy

Seems it was one more edition, 1937.

Comment on An Ephemeris Review from Olga Morales at AstrologyforGannTraders.com.au by Rolando

Rolando — Thu, 18 Feb 2016 05:52:20 +0000

Apply Sunspot , gann 60 year cycles, Einstein past, present and future with retrograde & direct,
outer planet HARD aspect.

Rolando

Comment on An Ephemeris Review from Olga Morales at AstrologyforGannTraders.com.au by ROHAN

ROHAN — Tue, 29 Sep 2015 16:01:54 +0000

hi ,,,madam you have covered time cycle,, i have noticed that mathematics in price cycle is same mathematics to time cycle same numbers are giving effects in squaring of price, for example nifty low was 2300 thats 360*6.6 it got squard at 360*26 9300,, price got squared which was predicted 1 yr in advance. the same system works in time also thats is after 6.6 yrs2300 days time and price got squared,, we can relate this to planets as well

Comment on An Ephemeris Review from Olga Morales at AstrologyforGannTraders.com.au by Melbourne Astrology Event - Luck, Venus, Jupiter and You | Jessica Adams

Melbourne Astrology Event - Luck, Venus, Jupiter and You | Jessica Adams — Thu, 02 Jul 2015 02:42:19 +0000

[...] midpoints specifically for lucky lotto days for three years now. She was inspired by her mentor W.D. Gann who used astrology successfully for lotto and horse [...]

Comment on An Ephemeris Review from Olga Morales at AstrologyforGannTraders.com.au by Orrin Bush

Orrin Bush — Mon, 01 Jul 2013 23:38:06 +0000

Olga: Look at the Swiss Franc chart for October 26, 2000.The lows seem to follow the Astrology numbers of the planets (Geocentric). For example, Pluto is zero, so 251 days added to October 26, 2000 equals July 4, 2001, which was almost a double bottom. Then, the Sun is one, so add 213 days to July 4, 2001, it eqals February 4, 2002.

Is it possible that Mr. Gann was referencing this in the Tunnel Thru The Air, as ‘ The markets following mathematical sequence’.
Pluto = 0 Sun = 1 Moon = 2 Jupiter = 3 Uranus = 4 Mercury = 5
Venus = 6 Neptune = 7 Saturn = 8 Mars = 9 .

Thank you for publishing your site,
Sincerely, Orrin Bush
Muskegon, Mi USA which is an old Lumber Town.

Comment on An Ephemeris Review from Olga Morales at AstrologyforGannTraders.com.au by shuky

shuky — Thu, 28 Feb 2013 11:33:51 +0000

i’m a professional trader and curious about astrology being used for trading

as i have no clue about astrology i’ll be happy if u can show me the path where to start, where education can be purchased and so forth

tnx, shuky

Comment on More about W.D. Gann’s Private Ephemeris by Cody Jones

Cody Jones — Fri, 10 Aug 2012 19:51:29 +0000

Hi Harvey,
There are actually two editions of “How to Make Profits in Commodities” from 1951. This was the year that W.D. sold his business to his partner Ed Lambert. The earlier edition you have does not have the forecast in the charts-but the later 1951 edition does. Other differences in the books are: the color of the book covers (blue and purple) and the advertising page in the back of the book differs. These books are getting harder and harder to find, but if you search-you will find two different 1951 editions. The forecasts were done by W.D. Gann as part of the deal with Ed Lambert.
Happy Hunting,
Cody Jones

Comment on More about W.D. Gann’s Private Ephemeris by Harvey Hahn

Harvey Hahn — Thu, 27 Jan 2011 05:41:09 +0000

In the blog post you state:

—————————————————————————
On June 6th 1951 “How to Make Profits in Commodities” was published.

A careful comparison of the two editions shows up some very interesting changes. For example, why are the charts on pages 359 to 366 revised and showing swings long past W.D Gann’s publication date of 1951 and his death in 1955?

He was clearly making Forecasts using an EPHEMERIS.
—————————————————————————

I assume the “two editions” referred to are the original first edition (1941) and the revised second edition (1951). In this case, the charts on pages 359 to 366 are brand new to the 1951 edition. On the other hand, if the “two editions” refers to the 1951 revised edition and a later reprint of the same edition (such as 1976), then it’s a matter of why the later 1976 and following reprints differ from the original 1951 edition.

I have a copy of the original 1951 book, as well as the newer 1976 (white dust jacket) and 2009 (orange dust jacket) reprint editions. The chart revisions mentioned are NOT in the original 1951 book. Perhaps they were added by Gann in his personal copy or by Ed Lambert as updates to the original charts as published in 1951, but no evidence is given as to where and when the additions originated.

In any case, the chart revisions appear in the reprint editions only and NOT in the original, which brings the chart revisions into question as to their authenticity. Without proof of such authenticity, the conclusion (”He was clearly making Forecasts using an EPHEMERIS”) does not follow, because the chart revisions could have been added by someone after the fact–hardly being a forecast.

Comment on Precious New Commodity by Ross Beck

Ross Beck — Thu, 06 Jan 2011 00:40:23 +0000

Congrats!!!